- 5 - On August 22, 2002, the Appeals officer again wrote to petitioners, asking that they contact her by September 6, 2002, to schedule a hearing. Petitioners responded to the Appeals officer’s letter on August 28, 2002, requesting that an “in person hearing” be scheduled “if possible after September 2002.” On September 9, 2002, the Appeals officer notified petitioners that she had scheduled an appointment for a hearing on October 9, 2002. The letter stated: “If this date or time is not convenient for you, please call me to reschedule this appointment by September 20, 2002.” On September 16, 2002, Ms. Pless wrote to the Appeals officer, requesting that the hearing be rescheduled “because of a conflict with my doctor’s appointments in October.” On October 1, 2002, the Appeals officer wrote to petitioners, suggesting three tentative dates for the hearing, to wit, October 24, October 28, or October 30, 2002. That letter also indicated that Ms. Pless would be given an opportunity to present factors relating to her innocent spouse claim during the hearing. On October 2, 2002, Ms. Pless mailed a letter dated October 1, 2002, to the Appeals officer, stating: My husband had an unexpected death in his family that resulted in his being hospitalized for a stress related illness. Therefore it will be necessary to schedule hearing date in November, preferably November 9th or November 16th, 2002. This will also allow me to meet my doctor’s appointments in October.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011