Vicki S. Pless and Coy E. Pless, Jr. - Page 8

                                        - 8 -                                         
                                   (iii) offers of collection                         
                              alternatives, which may include the                     
                              posting of a bond, the substitution of                  
                              other assets, an installment agreement,                 
                              or an offer-in-compromise.                              
                              (B) Underlying liability.--The person                   
                         may also raise at the hearing challenges to                  
                         the existence or amount of the underlying tax                
                         liability for any tax period if the person                   
                         did not receive any statutory notice of                      
                         deficiency for such tax liability or did not                 
                         otherwise have an opportunity to dispute such                
                         tax liability.                                               
          Petitioners have not suggested any challenge to the underlying              
          liability that they reported on their 1998 tax return.                      
               Respondent objected to consideration of any testimony at               
          trial or any evidence as to whether Ms. Pless qualifies for                 
          relief under section 6015(f) that was not presented during the              
          telephonic hearing of September 7, 2001.  The Court indicated               
          that the testimony would be allowed.  See Ewing v. Commissioner,            
          122 T.C. ___ (2004).  Although Ms. Pless was present at trial of            
          this case, she did not testify.  No medical records were ever               
          presented to respondent to corroborate Ms. Pless’s claims about             
          scheduling of medical appointments or hospitalization.  Mr. Pless           
          testified generally to financial difficulties arising from his              
          chiropractic practice and medical bills for Ms. Pless.  His                 
          testimony, however, failed to explain why petitioners could not             
          attend a hearing at any time between August 2002 and January 2003           
          or the inconsistency between the letters sent prior to the                  
          notices of determination and the letter sent after the notices of           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011