Sharon M. Rivera and Richard C. Rivera - Page 3

                                        - 2 -                                         
               Respondent determined deficiencies in petitioners' Federal             
          income taxes of $4,018 for 1999 and $4,130 for 2000.  The Court             
          must decide whether petitioners are entitled to deduct losses on            
          Schedule E, Supplemental Income and Loss, for either year.                  
          Respondent's adjustments to petitioners' itemized deductions are            
          computational and will be determined by the Court's resolution of           
          the Schedule E loss issue.                                                  
               The stipulated facts and exhibits received into evidence are           
          incorporated herein by reference.  At the time the petition in              
          this case was filed, petitioners resided in Newark, California.             
                                     Background                                       
               During the years here involved, petitioner Richard C. Rivera           
          was employed as an electrician, and petitioner Sharon M. Rivera             
          was employed as a "personnel technician".                                   
               Around 1989 or 1990, petitioners purchased improved real               
          property in Truckee, California, for about $80,000.  As of the              
          date of trial it was worth between $160,000 and $170,000.  In the           
          early 1990s, after a year or so of ownership, petitioners rented            
          their property through a vacation property management company               
          under short-term leases for the winter or for ski season.  This             
          caused a lot of wear and tear on the property, and they had "so             
          much trouble" from the renters.  Petitioners received numerous              
          complaints there were "extra people living at the property", and            








Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011