Joseph R. Rollins - Page 22

                                        - 22 -                                        
               transaction.  Such a knowledge requirement is not                      
               included in the tax provisions.  This distinction                      
               __________                                                             
               2 Generally, the substitute defines a prohibited transaction as        
               the same type of transaction that constitutes prohibited self-         
               dealings with respect to private foundations, with differences         
               that are appropriate in the employee benefit area.  As with the        
               private foundation rules, under the substitute, both direct and        
               indirect dealings of the proscribed type are prohibited.               
               conforms to the distinction in present law in the                      
               private foundation provisions (where a foundation’s                    
               manager generally is subject to a tax on self-dealing                  
               if he acted with knowledge, but a disqualified person                  
               is subject to tax without proof of knowledge). [Id. at                 
               306-307, 1974-3 C.B. at 467.]                                          
               *     *      *      *      *      *      *                             
               The substitute prohibits the direct or indirect                        
               transfer of any plan income or asset to or for the                     
               benefit of a party-in-interest.  It also prohibits the                 
               use of plan income or assets by or for the benefit of                  
               any party-in-interest.  As in other situations, this                   
               prohibited transaction may occur even though there has                 
               not been a transfer of money or property between the                   
               plan and a party-in-interest.  For example, securities                 
               purchases or sales by a plan to manipulate the price of                
               the security to the advantage of a party-in-interest                   
               constitutes a use by or for the benefit of a party-in-                 
               interest of any assets of the plan.  [Id. at 308, 1974-                
               3 C.B. at 469.]                                                        
                    *      *      *      *      *      *      *                       
                    The substitute also prohibits a fiduciary from                    
               receiving consideration for his own personal account                   
               from any party dealing with the plan in connection with                
               the transaction involving the income or assets of the                  
               plan.  This prevents, eg., “kickbacks” to a fiduciary.                 
                    In addition, the labor provisions (but not the tax                
               provisions) prohibit a fiduciary from acting in any                    
               transaction involving the plan on behalf of a person                   
               (or representing a party) whose interests are adverse                  
               to the interest of the plan or of its participants or                  
               beneficiaries.  This prevents a fiduciary from being                   
               put in a position where he has dual loyalties, and,                    





Page:  Previous  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011