Catherine Rosenthal - Page 5

                                        - 5 -                                         
          The inclusion of the additional $90,000 in income increased the             
          tax due less tax payments from the $4,143 overpayment reported on           
          the original 1996 return to a net tax due of $24,677, which was             
          reported on the amended 1996 return.  The amended 1996 return was           
          signed by petitioner as spouse and by Mr. Benenstock as preparer.           
          There was no signature on behalf of the deceased Louis.                     
               Petitioner paid the total tax due ($28,820) concurrent with            
          the filing of the amended 1996 return.  She paid that amount from           
          one of her accounts with Dime Savings Bank.  On February 10,                
          1999, in response to an IRS request for $4,334 of interest due on           
          the tax underpayment for 1996, petitioner mailed a check in that            
          amount to the IRS, drawn on her Dime Savings Bank checking                  
          account, which was reflected as paid, on an IRS transcript, as of           
          February 12, 1999.                                                          
          The Rosenthals                                                              
               Petitioner and Louis were married in 1976.  They had no                
          children together, but each had children (and, in the case of               
          Louis, grandchildren)3 from a prior marriage.                               
               Louis owned and operated a plumbing business for more than             
          50 years.  He retired from that business in 1994.  Petitioner did           
          not participate in and had no knowledge of any aspect of that               
          business.                                                                   


               3  The record does not indicate whether petitioner has                 
          grandchildren.                                                              




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011