Harold and Doreen Silk - Page 7

                                        - 6 -                                         
          taxable year in which the NOL was incurred.  Id.; see sec.                  
          301.9100-12T(b), Temporary Proced. & Admin. Regs., 57 Fed. Reg.             
          43896 (Sept. 23, 1992).  Once made, the election is irrevocable.            
          Id.  The statute directs the Secretary to prescribe the manner in           
          which taxpayers shall make the election.  Id.                               
               The Secretary promulgated the following regulation                     
          concerning a taxpayer’s election to waive NOL carrybacks:                   
               [The election] shall be made by a statement attached to                
               the return (or amended return) for the taxable year.                   
               The statement required when making an election pursuant                
               to this section shall indicate the section under which                 
               the election is being made and shall set forth                         
               information to identify the election, the period for                   
               which it applies, and the taxpayer’s basis or                          
               entitlement for making the election. [Sec. 301.9100-                   
               12T(d), Temporary Proced. & Admin. Regs., 57 Fed. Reg.                 
               43896 (Sept. 23, 1992) (redesignating sec. 7.0,                        
               Temporary Income Tax Regs., 42 Fed. Reg. 1470 (Jan. 7,                 
               1977)).]                                                               
               The Court analyzed these statutory and regulatory                      
          requirements under section 172 in Young v. Commissioner, 83 T.C.            
          831 (1984), affd. 783 F.2d 1201 (5th Cir. 1986).  In Young, the             
          Court held that to be in substantial compliance with the election           
          requirements, “as an absolute minimum, the taxpayer must exhibit            
          in some manner, within the time prescribed by the statute, his              
          unequivocal agreement to accept both the benefits and burdens of            
          the tax treatment afforded by that section.”  Id. at 839.                   
               Petitioners contend that the postal receipt is evidence that           
          the so-called draft return and the April 4, 1996 letter were                
          mailed to respondent and, thus, the election requirements under             





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011