Lyndon D. Sinele - Page 2

                                        - 2 -                                         

                       MEMORANDUM FINDINGS OF FACT AND OPINION                        

               VASQUEZ, Judge:  Respondent determined a $7,411 deficiency             
          in and a $1,457 penalty pursuant to section 66622 on petitioner’s           
          2000 Federal income tax.  After concessions,3 the issues for                
          decision are:  (1) Whether during 2000 petitioner received                  
          $29,490.83 in income from Dynamex Operations East, Inc.                     
          (Dynamex); and (2) whether petitioner is liable for the section             
          6662 penalty for 2000.                                                      
                                  FINDINGS OF FACT                                    
               Some of the facts have been stipulated and are so found.               
          The oral stipulation of facts and the referenced exhibits are               
          incorporated herein by this reference.  At the time he filed the            
          petition, petitioner resided in Claycomo, Missouri.                         
               During 2000, petitioner worked for Professional Express,               
          Inc. (PEI), and Dynamex.  During 2000, petitioner received wage             
          income of $1,414.56 from PEI, and he received income of                     




               2  Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to           
          the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the year in issue, and              
          all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and              
          Procedure.                                                                  
               3  Petitioner conceded that during 2000 he received                    
          $1,414.56 in wage income from Professional Express, Inc.  At                
          trial, petitioner failed to address respondent’s self-employment            
          tax determination with respect to income from Dynamex, other than           
          to dispute receiving the amount subject to self-employment tax.             
          Petitioner failed to file any briefs.  Accordingly, the                     
          application of self-employment tax is computational.                        



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011