- 4 - Respondent made several attempts to contact petitioner in advance of trial, including sending a Branerton letter, in order to stipulate facts and documents for trial. In response to respondent’s Branerton letter, petitioner advised respondent that he would not be available to meet until the day of calendar call. Petitioner later advised respondent that he would be in Boston on the Friday before calendar call to meet with respondent and discuss the stipulation of facts. Petitioner did not show up for this meeting. Petitioner first contacted Mr. Arnowitz and Mr. Hause the Thursday before calendar call, and he retained them to represent him the next day (the Friday before calendar call). OPINION I. The Deficiency A. Burden of Proof As a general rule, the taxpayer bears the burden of proving the Commissioner’s deficiency determinations incorrect. Rule 142(a); Welch v. Helvering, 290 U.S. 111, 115 (1933). Section 7491(a), however, provides that if a taxpayer introduces credible evidence and meets certain other prerequisites, the Commissioner shall bear the burden of proof with respect to factual issues relating to the liability of the taxpayer for a tax imposed under subtitle A or B of the Code.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011