Lawrence Michael Spanier - Page 3

                                        - 2 -                                         
          all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and              
          Procedure.  The decisions to be entered are not reviewable by any           
          other court, and this opinion should not be cited as authority.             
               Respondent determined for 1998 a deficiency in Lawrence                
          Michael Spanier's Federal income tax of $3,468 and an accuracy-             
          related penalty under section 6662(a) of $694.  Respondent also             
          determined for 1998 a deficiency in Pamela Spanier's Federal                
          income tax of $2,415 and an accuracy-related penalty under                  
          section 6662(a) and an addition to tax under section 6651(a) of             
          $483 and $241, respectively.                                                
               Lawrence Michael Spanier (Mr. Spanier) and Pamela Spanier              
          (Ms. Spanier) were formerly married to each other.  The issues              
          for decision are:  (1) Which petitioner is entitled to deductions           
          for dependency exemptions with respect to three children from               
          their former marriage; (2) whether either petitioner is subject             
          to the accuracy-related penalty under section 6662(a); and (3)              
          whether Ms. Spanier is subject to an addition to tax under                  
          section 6651(a)(1) for failure to timely file her 1998 Federal              
          income tax return.                                                          
               The stipulated facts and exhibits received into evidence are           
          incorporated herein by reference.  At the time the petitions in             
          these cases were filed, both petitioners resided in California.             
          The Court consolidated these cases for purposes of trial,                   
          briefing, and opinion because they involve common facts and                 






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011