- 4 - Security numbers to claim a tax benefit.1 In separate notices of deficiency dated January 9, 2003, respondent disallowed the three dependency exemption deductions claimed by Mr. Spanier and Ms. Spanier on their respective returns. A copy of the judgment of divorce was not offered into evidence; however, copies of several subsequent court orders were offered relating to various visitation and child and spousal support questions that arose after the divorce. None of the court documents addressed the dependency exemption deductions for the children for Federal income tax purposes. On March 12, 2003, Mr. Spanier petitioned the superior court of California requesting a determination that he is entitled to claim dependency exemption deductions for the children for 1997 and 1998 and that Ms. Spanier be ordered to execute the necessary releases. A hearing was held on May 14, 2003, and on August 22, 2003, the superior court granted Mr. Spanier's petition. The superior court's order states, in pertinent part: This Nunc pro tunc order corrects the previous order, which failed to reflect the true intention of the Court at the time the order was rendered. At the time the order was rendered, it was the intent of the Court to allow the transfer of the dependency exemptions. This order does not constitute a modification of the prior order, but rather a clarification of the same. 1This letter refers only to duplication of two of the three Social Security numbers assigned to petitioners' children. No explanation is given for the omission of the third Social Security number.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011