Sunoco, Inc. and Subsidiaries - Page 31

                                       - 31 -                                         
             The Conformity Rule of Section 446(a)                                    
                  The provisions of section 446 spell out the relation-               
             ship between a taxpayer’s method of accounting for book                  
             purposes and the manner of computing the taxpayer’s taxable              
             income for tax purposes.  The general rule for methods of                
             accounting, set out in subsection (a), requires a taxpayer               
             to compute taxable income “under the method of accounting                
             on the basis of which the taxpayer regularly computes his                
             income in keeping his books.”  Sec. 446(a).  The phrase                  
             “income in keeping his books” used in section 446(a) and                 
             (e) refers to net income computed for financial accounting               
             purposes, in accordance with the generally accepted                      
             accounting principles in a particular trade or business                  
             applied consistently from year to year.  See sec. 1.446-                 
             1(a)(2), Income Tax Regs.  Thus, subsection (a) of section               
             446 requires the taxpayer’s method of computing taxable                  
             income to conform to the taxpayer’s method of accounting                 
             for book purposes.  We sometimes refer to this general rule              
             as the conformity requirement.                                           
                  Courts have consistently held that the conformity rule              
             of section 446(a) is not an absolute requirement and that                
             tax accounting requirements may diverge from financial                   
             accounting standards.  See, e.g., FPL Group, Inc. &                      
             Subs. v. Commissioner, 115 T.C. 554, 562-563 (2000); US                  






Page:  Previous  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011