Roland Gyula Szasz - Page 12

                                       - 11 -                                         
               “Alternative Minimum Tax”.[7]  3.  Please consider that                
               after I agreed to “Consent to Extend the Time to Assess                
               Tax”, the IRS response was received 4 months after the                 
               due date of December 31, 2002!                                         
          II.  Discussion                                                             
               A.  Statute of Limitations                                             
               We must first decide whether the statute of limitations bars           
          the assessment of the deficiencies in issue.  In doing so, we               
          must decide whether the last consent is valid for 1998 and 1999.            
          If it is valid, then the period for assessment of income tax was            
          extended and respondent’s notice of deficiency for 1998 and 1999            
          was timely.  If, however, the last consent is invalid, then the             
          period for assessment of income tax expired before respondent               
          issued the notice of deficiency.                                            
               Generally, an income tax must be assessed within 3 years               
          after the applicable return is filed.  Sec. 6501(a).  In this               
          regard, a return filed before the due date is considered as                 
          having been filed on the date it was due.  Sec. 6501(b)(1).  This           
          period may be extended, however, if the taxpayer and the                    
          Commissioner consent in writing, before the expiration of the               
          limitations period, to extend the 3-year period of limitations.             
          Sec. 6501(c)(4)(A).  The Commissioner and the taxpayer may extend           
          the period so agreed upon by subsequent agreements in writing               


               7  We note that respondent did not determine in the notice             
          of deficiency that petitioner is subject to the alternative                 
          minimum tax.  Therefore, we need not address petitioner’s                   
          allegation.                                                                 





Page:  Previous  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011