Roland Gyula Szasz - Page 13

                                       - 12 -                                         
          made before the expiration of the period previously agreed upon.            
          Id.                                                                         
               The bar of the statute of limitations on assessment is an              
          affirmative defense, and the party raising it must specifically             
          plead it and carry the burden of proving its applicability.                 
          Rules 39, 142(a).  If the taxpayer makes a prima facie case                 
          proving the filing date of his or her income tax return and the             
          expiration of the statutory period prior to the mailing of the              
          notice of deficiency, the burden of going forward with the                  
          evidence shifts to respondent.  Robinson v. Commissioner, 57 T.C.           
          735, 737 (1972).  Respondent may discharge this burden by showing           
          that the parties executed a written consent, valid on its face,             
          extending the period of limitations for assessment and that the             
          notice of deficiency was mailed prior to the expiration of the              
          extended period.  Adler v. Commissioner, 85 T.C. 535, 541 (1985).           
          If respondent introduces an apparently valid consent and the                
          taxpayer asserts that such consent is ineffective, the burden of            
          going forward again shifts back to the taxpayer to affirmatively            
          show the invalidity of the written consent.  Id.  The burden of             
          proof; i.e., the burden of ultimate persuasion, however, always             
          remains with the party who pleads that the assessment is barred             
          by the statute of limitations.  Id. at 540.                                 
               Petitioner timely filed his 1998 and 1999 income tax                   
          returns, and the period of limitations with respect to those                






Page:  Previous  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011