Amaro A. Taibo - Page 10

                                       - 10 -                                         
               On August 23, 2002, respondent mailed a notice of deficiency           
          to petitioner with respect to the $10,828 accuracy-related                  
          penalty for 2000 which petitioner had not yet paid.                         
               On November 7, 2002, petitioner became the sixth Raytheon              
          employee to file a petition in this Court in which petition                 
          petitioner challenges not the taxability of his Johnston Island             
          wages but only the imposition by respondent of the $10,828                  
          accuracy-related penalty.                                                   
               On December 24, 2002, the Court of Appeals for the Ninth               
          Circuit in Farrell v. United States, 313 F.3d 1214 (9th Cir.                
          2002), affirmed the District Court’s decision in Farrell v.                 
          United States, 87 AFTR 2d 1159, 2001-1 USTC par. 50,279 (D. Haw.            
          2001).  The Court of Appeals held that Johnston Island does not             
          constitute a foreign country for purposes of section 911 and does           
          not constitute a specified possession for purposes of section               
          931.  In addition, the Court of Appeals held that section 931               
          controls over the conflicting regulation at section 1.931-1,                
          Income Tax Regs.  Therefore, the Court of Appeals concluded that            
          wages earned on Johnston Island by U.S. citizens constituted                
          taxable income.                                                             
               On January 14, 2003, we decided Jones v. Commissioner, T.C.            
          Memo. 2003-14, involving the fourth petition filed in the Tax               
          Court involving Johnston Island wages.  In our decision in Jones,           
          we held that Johnston Island does not constitute a foreign                  
          country for purposes of section 911 and that Johnston Island does           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011