Amaro A. Taibo - Page 11

                                       - 11 -                                         
          not constitute a specified possession for purposes of section               
          931.  We also held that section 931 controls over the conflicting           
          regulation at section 1.931-1, Income Tax Regs., and that, for              
          years beginning after December 31, 1986, section 931 applies to             
          income earned by U.S. citizens on Johnston Island, making the               
          wages taxable income.                                                       
               On June 16, 2003, the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit           
          decided Haessly v. Commissioner, 68 Fed. Appx. 44 (9th Cir.                 
          2003), affg. Specking v. Commissioner, 117 T.C. 95 (2001), and              
          held that Johnston Island does not constitute a foreign country             
          for purposes of section 911 and, following its opinion in Farrell           
          v. United States, supra, that Johnston Island does not constitute           
          a specified possession for purposes of section 931.  The Court of           
          Appeals affirmed our opinion in Specking v. Commissioner, supra,            
          and concluded that wages earned on Johnston Island constituted              
          taxable income.                                                             
               On June 24, 2003, the taxpayer in Jones v. Commissioner,               
          T.C. Memo. 2003-14, filed an appeal of our decision therein to              
          the Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, which appeal is              
          still pending.                                                              
               In the above deficiency determinations by respondent, and in           
          the above court opinions regarding the taxability of Johnston               
          Island wages by the District Court, the Tax Court, and the Courts           
          of Appeals, no penalties were asserted against the taxpayers, and           
          none was imposed by the courts.                                             




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011