Estate of Emanuel Trompeter, Deceased, Robin Carol Trompeter Gonzalez and Janet Ilene Trompeter Polachek, Co-Executors - Page 86

                                        -85-                                          
          approximately three times the 4-percent rate that we believe                
          reflects the time value of money and, as discussed above, is the            
          same rate at which a holder of series A preferred stock would be            
          compensated following an untimely redemption.  A 12.5-percent               
          rate also approximates the rate that as of the applicable                   
          valuation date was payable on the series B subordinated                     
          debentures, the debt into which the series A preferred stock was            
          convertible, and is 5 percentage points greater than the rate               
          that was payable on the senior term notes as of December 31,                
          1992.53                                                                     
               The estate asserts on remand that we should determine the              
          fair market value of the series A preferred stock by applying a             
          20-percent discount rate to the $1,947,845 actually paid to                 
          redeem the decedent’s shares.  We disagree.  In addition to the             
          fact that the estate’s proffered rate does not take into account            
          our finding that a holder of series A preferred stock would                 
          following a missed redemption be entitled to daily dividends at a           
          12.5-percent annual rate, the estate’s rate ignores the solid               
          history of Sterling in honoring its contractual obligations.  We            
          also are unpersuaded by the record before us that a rate                    
          approximately seven times the referenced T-bill and inflation               
          rates is appropriate in this case, let alone that we should apply           

               53 We recognize that Dec. 31, 1992, postdates the applicable           
          valuation date.  We believe that a hypothetical buyer on the                
          applicable valuation date could have ascertained this rate.                 





Page:  Previous  75  76  77  78  79  80  81  82  83  84  85  86  87  88  89  90  91  92  93  94  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011