William F. Urbano and Flota L. Urbano - Page 19

                                       - 19 -                                         
          (7th Cir. 1995); Bax v. Commissioner, 13 F.3d 54, 58 (2d Cir.               
          1993); Asciutto v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1992-564, affd. per             
          order 26 F.3d 108 (9th Cir. 1994).  Petitioners also do not                 
          qualify for an abatement of interest under the applicable version           
          of section 6404(e)(1).  Such an abatement requires the occurrence           
          of a “ministerial act”, and the revenue agent’s disregard of                
          section 6601(d)(1) results not from a ministerial act but from a            
          misapplication of Federal tax law.  See sec. 301.6404-4(b)(1) and           
          (2), Proced. & Admin. Regs.                                                 
               In sum, we hold for respondent as to all of the substantive            
          matters in dispute.  In so doing, we have considered all                    
          arguments made by the parties and have found those arguments not            
          discussed herein to be irrelevant and/or without merit.                     
          Accordingly,                                                                
                                                       Decision will be               
                                                  entered for respondent.             



















Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  

Last modified: May 25, 2011