Ronald F. and Cynthia G. Van Scoten - Page 24

                                       - 24 -                                         
          promotional materials received by petitioners specifically called           
          the Hoyt investment a “tax shelter” and specifically stated that            
          the primary return on any investment would be from tax savings.             
               In the years preceding their investment, 1987 through 1989,            
          petitioners reported adjusted gross income (AGI) averaging                  
          approximately $43,000 each year.  In each of these years,                   
          petitioners paid Federal income taxes in an amount averaging                
          approximately $4,300.  After making their investment in DSBS 87-C           
          in January 1991, petitioners filed a 1990 return on which they              
          claimed a deduction for a partnership loss of $148,390, reducing            
          their 1990 tax liability on $46,162 of wage income to only $842.            
          Petitioners then filed the Form 1045 on which they used the                 
          partnership loss to reduce their tax liability to zero in each of           
          1987, 1988, and 1989.  Finally, for the year in issue, 1991,                
          petitioners claimed an additional partnership loss deduction of             
          $45,510, resulting in a tax liability of $1,798.  While this loss           
          was partially offset by the farm income reported on the return,             
          petitioners’ tax liability was nevertheless less than half of               
          petitioners’ average tax liability before application of the                
          carryback in the years prior to their investment.                           
               Petitioners claimed the tax benefits from the partnership              
          losses based solely on the advice that they received from the               
          promoters of the investment and from other Hoyt investors.                  
          Furthermore, the promotional materials that petitioners received            
          had clearly indicated that there were substantial tax risks in              





Page:  Previous  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011