Vicki Jo James - Page 10

                                        - 9 -                                         
               Rev. Proc. 2000-15, sec. 4.02, 2000-1 C.B. at 448, describes           
          the circumstances under which the Commissioner will “ordinarily”            
          grant equitable relief in cases where a liability reported on a             
          joint return is unpaid.  These elements are:                                
                    (a) At the time relief is requested, the                          
              requesting spouse is no longer married to, or is legally                
              separated from, the nonrequesting spouse * * *;                         
                    (b) At the time the return was signed, the                        
              requesting spouse had no knowledge or reason to know                    
              that the tax would not be paid. The requesting spouse                   
              must establish that it was reasonable for the requesting                
              spouse to believe that the nonrequesting spouse would                   
              pay the reported liability. * * *; and                                  
                    (c) The requesting spouse will suffer economic                    
              hardship if relief is not granted. * * *                                
          Rev. Proc. 2000-15, sec. 4.02(1), 2000-1 C.B. at 448.                       
               Respondent acknowledges that petitioner satisfies the first            
          requirement, but argues that petitioner does not qualify for                
          relief under sec. 4.02 of the revenue procedure because she:  (1)           
          Knew or had reason to know that the liabilities reported on the             
          joint returns for 1995 through 1997 would not be paid at the                
          times that she signed those returns; and (2) has not demonstrated           
          that she would suffer economic hardship if relief is not granted.           
          We agree with respondent on both points.                                    
               Although petitioner did not participate in the family                  
          farming operation, she was aware of the family’s financial                  
          situation.  She was aware that her former spouse was having                 
          trouble satisfying his then-current financial obligations when              






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011