- 3 - On October 18, 2002, petitioner filed a Form 12153, Request for a Collection Due Process Hearing, regarding his 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, and 1998 tax years (hearing request). Petitioner attached the hearing notice and a 12-page letter to the hearing request. Petitioner argued that respondent failed to follow the requirements of applicable law and administrative procedure. On February 24, 2003, respondent’s San Francisco Appeals Office sent petitioner a letter stating that it had received his hearing request and explaining the hearing process. On May 7, 2003, Appeals Officer James Chambers sent petitioner a letter requesting that petitioner contact him to schedule a section 6330 hearing (hearing). Appeals Officer Chambers advised petitioner that the hearing could be held in person, by telephone, or by correspondence. On May 19, 2003, petitioner sent Appeals Officer Chambers a letter requesting an in-person hearing closer to his home than San Francisco, California. Petitioner suggested that the hearing be held at respondent’s office in Eureka, California.2 On June 16, 2003, Appeals Officer Chambers sent petitioner a letter stating that the San Francisco Appeals Office was the closest option for an in-person hearing. Appeals Officer Chambers again offered petitioner the option of a telephone 2 From the record, it is unclear whether respondent had an Appeals Office in Eureka, California.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011