Ragnhild A. Westby - Page 21

                                       - 21 -                                         
          introduce evidence sufficient, if believed, to demonstrate by a             
          preponderance of the evidence that respondent’s determination is            
          excessive; i.e., erroneous and/or arbitrary, “without rational              
          foundation”.  Helvering v. Taylor, 293 U.S. 507, 514-515 (1935);            
          see also Pittman v. Commissioner, 100 F.3d 1308, 1317 (7th Cir.             
          1996), affg. T.C. Memo. 1995-243; Page v. Commissioner, 58 F.3d             
          1342, 1347-1348 (8th Cir. 1995), affg. T.C. Memo. 1993-398.  If             
          petitioner successfully carries her initial burden of production            
          as to a particular adjustment, the burden of production; i.e.,              
          the burden of introducing evidence showing an adjustment is                 
          warranted, shifts to respondent.  Helvering v. Taylor, supra at             
          514-515; Berkery v. Commissioner, 91 T.C. 179, 186 (1988), affd.            
          without published opinion 872 F.2d 411 (3d Cir. 1989); Cozzi v.             
          Commissioner, 88 T.C. 435, 443-444 (1987); Jackson v.                       
          Commissioner, 73 T.C. 394, 401 (1979).                                      
               B.  Unreported Income Adjustments for 1987 and 1989                    
               In this case, the parties agree that the unreported income             
          adjustments arise from petitioner’s law practice.  Our review of            
          the record confirms that there is a sufficient evidentiary base,            
          if one is required, to support a conclusion that petitioner was             
          engaged in an income-generating activity during each of the years           
          at issue and that petitioner has the burden of proving that                 
          income adjustments in the notices of deficiency were arbitrary              








Page:  Previous  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011