- 4 - and repeated her claim that she, not Mr. Mansour, was WFO’s proper representative in its case. We set a hearing to determine the person authorized to represent WFO and to receive evidence with respect to respondent’s Motion for Entry of Decisions. FINDINGS OF FACT Based upon the evidentiary hearing and the record in these cases, we make the following findings of fact. Mr. and Mrs. Wolfe resided in Cincinnati, Ohio, when they filed their petitions. They were married at the time but subsequently initiated divorce proceedings. WFO had its principal place of business in Cincinnati, Ohio, when it filed its petition. WFO is wholly owned by Mrs. Wolfe, who serves as WFO’s president and signed WFO’s petition as its representative. See Rule 24(b). WFO operates a club under the trade name of Bristol’s. I. Negotiations Leading to the Settlement Trial in these cases was originally set for January 13, 2003, in Cincinnati, Ohio. Petitioners had retained Mr. Mansour, a certified public accountant, to represent them before the Internal Revenue Service, though Mr. Mansour did not sign any of the petitions in these cases. However, as the trial date approached, petitioners retained James F. McCarthy, III, as counsel. Mr. McCarthy entered his appearance on behalf of Mr. and Mrs. Wolfe and WFO at the calendar call on January 13, 2003,Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011