- 12 -
On May 31, 2003, at the behest of Messrs. Wolfe and Mansour,
and purportedly acting as “Receiver authorized as Sole Director”
of WFO, Mr. Deborde signed a corporate resolution appointing Mr.
Mansour WFO’s secretary and authorizing him to act as a
representative for WFO in this proceeding.
On June 4, 2003, the Court received what purported to be a
response from Mr. and Mrs. Wolfe and WFO to respondent’s Motion
for Entry of Decisions. Mr. Mansour signed on behalf of WFO as
secretary. Mr. Wolfe signed on his own behalf. Mrs. Wolfe did
not sign the submission; rather, Mr. Wolfe signed Mrs. Wolfe’s
name, without her knowledge or consent, omitting the “(by POA)”
designation he had used on the earlier submissions. This
submission repeated the arguments that had been made in the
original and supplemental submissions related to Mr. McCarthy’s
motion to withdraw; i.e., the claim that Mr. McCarthy signed the
stipulation of settled issues without Mr. and Mrs. Wolfe’s
authorization. Attached to the submission was a copy of the
affidavit of Mr. Wolfe that had been previously submitted, as
well as the two affidavits signed by Mrs. Wolfe on April 21,
2003. On the same day, the Court received a letter from Mrs.
Wolfe asserting that she was the sole shareholder of WFO and that
Mr. Mansour was not authorized to act on its behalf in this
proceeding.
Page: Previous 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 NextLast modified: May 25, 2011