Karol Z. Widemon - Page 10

                                       - 10 -                                         
               Petitioner argues that respondent raised new matters by                
          challenging petitioner's claimed deductions for capital loss                
          carryforwards and rental expenses.  The Court interprets                    
          petitioner's argument to be that respondent bears the burden of             
          proof with regard to these issues.  Respondent asserts that the             
          notice of deficiency resulted from petitioner's failure to file             
          timely a tax return for 1999.  Respondent contends that no new              
          matters were raised, and that respondent simply requested                   
          substantiation for the deductions petitioner claimed on the                 
          return submitted after she received the notice of deficiency.               
               A new theory that is presented to sustain a deficiency is              
          treated as a new matter when it either alters the original                  
          deficiency or requires the presentation of different evidence.              
          Hutchinson v. Commissioner, 116 T.C. 172, 182 (2001) (citing                
          Wayne Bolt & Nut Co. v. Commissioner, 93 T.C. 500, 507 (1989));             
          Shea v. Commissioner, 112 T.C. 183, 197 (1999); Colonnade                   
          Condominium, Inc. v. Commissioner, 91 T.C. 793, 795 n.3 (1988);             
          Va. Educ. Fund v. Commissioner, 85 T.C. 743, 751 (1985), affd.              
          per curiam 799 F.2d 903 (4th Cir. 1986); Achiro v. Commissioner,            
          77 T.C. 881, 890 (1981).  A new theory which merely clarifies or            
          develops the original determination made in the notice of                   
          deficiency without being inconsistent or increasing the amount of           
          the deficiency is not new matter in respect of which the                    
          Commissioner bears the burden of proof.  Hutchinson v.                      






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011