Karol Z. Widemon - Page 14

                                       - 14 -                                         
          carryforward.  Meissner v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1995-191;               
          Aazami v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1993-436.                                
               Petitioner refused to testify about the capital loss                   
          carryforwards.  Aside from her 1997 and 1998 tax returns,                   
          petitioner offered little evidence to substantiate these losses.            
          An entry on a tax return does not establish the existence of a              
          loss.  Halle v. Commissioner, 7 T.C. 245, 250 (1946), affd. 175             
          F.2d 500 (2d Cir. 1949); Foust v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1995-            
          481.  Respondent’s determination that petitioner is not entitled            
          to a deduction for capital loss carryforwards is sustained.                 
          3.   Rental Expenses                                                        
               Section 212 provides a deduction for all ordinary and                  
          necessary expenses paid or incurred with respect to management,             
          conservation, and maintenance of property held for production of            
          income, including real property.  Sec. 1.212-1(h), Income Tax               
          Regs.  Generally, a taxpayer must establish that deductions taken           
          pursuant to section 212 are ordinary and necessary expenses and             
          must maintain records sufficient to substantiate the amounts of             
          the deductions claimed.  Sec. 6001; Meneguzzo v. Commissioner, 43           
          T.C. 824, 831-832 (1965); sec. 1.6001-1(a), (e), Income Tax Regs.           
               Respondent disallowed $7,520 of the expenses pertaining to             
          Primera and $7,744 of the expenses pertaining to Otium.  At                 
          trial, petitioner refused to provide any information at all                 
          pertaining to these expenses.  The Court sustains respondent's              






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011