Bernadette Williams - Page 5

                                        - 4 -                                         
               As of the close of 2000, petitioner had not attained the age           
          of 59 �.  At the time, her outstanding loan balance from the                
          retirement plan was $16,098 (the distribution).  The distribution           
          is reported on a Form 1099-R, Distributions From Pensions,                  
          Annuities, Retirement or Profit-Sharing Plans, IRAs, Insurance              
          Contracts, etc., issued to petitioner by USPS.                              
               Petitioner filed a timely 2000 Federal income tax return.              
          In addition to other items, the distribution is included in the             
          income reported on that return.  The Federal income tax reported            
          on her 2000 return does not include the additional tax imposed by           
          section 72(t).  In the notice of deficiency, respondent                     
          determined that petitioner is liable for the additional tax                 
          imposed by section 72(t) with respect to the distribution.                  
          Discussion2                                                                 
               Section 72(t)(1) imposes an additional tax on early                    
          distributions from qualified retirement plans “equal to 10                  
          percent of the portion of such amount which is includable in                
          gross income.”  Failure to make any installment payment when due            
          in accordance with the terms of a loan from a qualified                     
          retirement plan may result in a taxable distribution.  Sec.                 
          72(p).  Accordingly, a loan that constitutes a taxable                      
          distribution is subject to the 10-percent additional tax on early           


               2  Petitioner does not argue for the application of sec.               
          7491.                                                                       





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011