Ralf Zacky - Page 9

                                        - 9 -                                         
          Reorganization” (confirmed plan).  Under the confirmed plan, the            
          plan continued to be listed as an unsecured creditor.                       
                                       OPINION                                        
               Respondent determined that petitioner is liable for both               
          tiers of excise taxes under section 4975(a) and (b).  Respondent            
          asserts on brief that petitioner is a “disqualified person” under           
          section 4975(e)(2) as to each of the three loans, that the plan             
          is a “plan” under section 4975(e)(1), that each of the three                
          loans is a “prohibited transaction” under section 4975(c), and              
          that none of the three loans has been “corrected” within the                
          meaning of section 4975(f)(5).  Petitioner does not dispute that            
          he was a “disqualified person” as to each of the three loans.  He           
          was.  See, e.g., sec. 4975(e)(2)(A), (E).1  Nor does petitioner             

               1 Under subpars. (A) and (E), respectively, of sec.                    
          4975(e)(2), a “disqualified person” is a person who is “a                   
          fiduciary” or “an owner, direct or indirect, of 50 percent or               
          more of * * * the combined voting power of all classes of stock             
          entitled to vote or the total value of shares of all classes of             
          stock of a corporation * * * which is an employer” of any                   
          employees covered by the plan.  As relevant herein, petitioner              
          was a fiduciary (i.e., a trustee) of the plan who was the sole              
          owner of the stock of an employer (Aspects) whose employees were            
          covered by the plan.  Under sec. 4975(e)(2)(G), a “disqualified             
          person” also is a corporation of which 50 percent or more of the            
          combined voting power of all classes of stock entitled to vote or           
          the total value of shares of all classes of stock is owned by a             
          person described in sec. 4975(e)(2)(A) or (E).  Thus, by virtue             
          of its ownership by petitioner, Inland also was a disqualified              
          person as to the second and third loans.  The possibility that              
          Inland may be liable for excise taxes under sec. 4975(a) or (b)             
          as to the second and third loans is unimportant to our analysis             
          in that petitioner is jointly and severally liable for any excise           
          tax imposed on those loans by sec. 4975(a) and (b).  See sec.               
                                                             (continued...)           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011