-5-
2000, petitioners filed motions for continuance on the ground
that moving the trials to Jacksonville would work a hardship on
them. The Court granted petitioners’ motions for continuance.
On May 10, 2001, for the third time, the Court issued
notices setting the cases for trial, at the session of the Court
beginning October 15, 2001, in Tampa, Florida. Pursuant to the
parties’ joint requests, on September 25, 2001, the trials were
continued again.
On May 23, 2002, for the fourth time, the Court issued
notices setting the cases for trial, at the session of the Court
beginning October 28, 2002, in Tampa, Florida. On October 16,
2002, petitioners filed motions for continuance, on the grounds
that the Gazis had moved to Baltimore, Maryland, and wished to
transfer the place of trial there. The Court granted
petitioners’ motions.
On December 18, 2002, for the fifth time, the Court issued
notices setting the cases for trial, at the session of the Court
beginning May 19, 2003, in Baltimore, Maryland. On January 23,
2003, the Court ordered the parties to file a joint status report
on or before March 19, 2003, advising the Court of the progress
that had been made in preparing for trial. On March 19, 2003,
respondent filed a status report, signed by Ms. Miller,
indicating that on the basis of representations by petitioners
and their counsel, she believed that a forthcoming revenue
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011