All Community Walk In Clinic - Page 9

                                         -9-                                          
          certain concessions by both parties:  Total deficiencies for the            
          7 years at issue were reduced by $568,259 ($219,723 in the                  
          stipulated decision versus $787,982 in the notice of deficiency),           
          and additions to tax for negligence were substituted for the                
          civil fraud penalty, resulting in a further reduction of over               
          $300,000 in petitioners’ tax liability as determined in the                 
          Gazis’ notice of deficiency.  On July 8, 2003, the Court entered            
          its decision in docket No. 7950-98 pursuant to the stipulation.             
          No notice of appeal or timely motion to vacate or revise the                
          decision having been filed in this case, the decision in docket             
          No. 7950-98 became final on October 6, 2003.  See sec.                      
          7481(a)(1); Fed. R. App. P. 13(a).                                          
               On March 12, 2004, petitioners filed motions for leave to              
          file motions to vacate final decisions in these cases, lodging              
          therewith their motions to vacate.  The motions were signed by              
          Caroline D. Ciraolo, who on the same date filed entries of                  
          appearance in these cases.  Also on the same date, petitioners              
          filed motions to withdraw Mr. Kauffman as counsel in these cases.           
               On December 15, 2004, the Court held an evidentiary hearing            
          in Washington, D.C., with respect to the motions.6  At the                  
          commencement of the hearing, the Court granted petitioners’                 
          motions to withdraw Mr. Kauffman as counsel.  At the conclusion             


               6 The hearing was delayed in part at the request of                    
          petitioners’ new counsel because of her pregnancy.                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011