-5-
1. Accepting perjured documents and testimony from the
defendants;
2. denying petitioner a full and fair opportunity to
access the discovery process;
3. generally failing to comply with the Canons of
Judicial Conduct;
4. applying improper standards of adjudication to
petitioner’s motions and complaints;
5. fabricating the fact that petitioner “participated
in the illegal [RICO] scheme by virtue of his underwriting”,
see Allum v. Valley Bank, 849 P.2d 297, 301-302 (Nev. 1993);
and
6. advocating on behalf of the defendants.
Correspondingly, petitioner claimed that the defendants, in
furtherance of Nevada’s “‘good ole boy network’”, violated his
substantive due process right by using him as “an example” to
promote the protection afforded to the lawyer politicians’
contributors and coerce the contributors’ employees into
submitting to abuse and hostile working conditions.
Petitioner also alleged in his complaint that he suffered
unspecified physical and emotional damages as the result of the
civil rights violations, and he sought both punitive and
compensatory damages. In regard to his RICO claims, petitioner
alleged that he lost income and incurred the costs of prosecuting
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011