Edward R. Arevalo - Page 8

                                        - 8 -                                         
          represented to investors that these modifications made the pay              
          phones compliant with the ADA.  The ATC pay phone agreement also            
          stated:  “Phones have approved installation under the                       
          * * * [ADA]”.  Petitioner was not provided with a list of the               
          modifications that were made to the pay phones that were assigned           
          to him, and he did not know the cost of these modifications.                
          Petitioner claimed a $1,894 tax credit with respect to the pay              
          phones on Form 8826, Disabled Access Credit, that was attached to           
          his income tax return for 2001.  For purposes of claiming this              
          credit, petitioner reported that he had $10,000 of “eligible                
          access expenditures” during 2001.                                           
               Alpha Telcom grew rapidly but was poorly managed and                   
          ultimately operated at a loss.  On August 24, 2001, Alpha Telcom            
          filed for bankruptcy under chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code in             
          the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida.             
          The case was later transferred to the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for             
          the District of Oregon on September 17, 2001.  On March 15, 2002,           
          petitioner filed a proof of claim in the bankruptcy court in the            
          amount of $11,166.80, representing the $10,000 that he had                  
          invested plus approximately 9 or 10 months of payments that he              
          had not received from ATC as of the claim date.  The bankruptcy             
          case was dismissed on September 10, 2003, by motion of Alpha                
          Telcom.  The bankruptcy court held that it was “in the best                 
          interest of creditors and the estate to dismiss so that                     






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011