Magellean Askew, Jr. - Page 15

                                       - 14 -                                         
          exceeds the investment in the contract.11  Therefore, the                   
          distribution of $24,146 is includable in petitioner’s gross                 
          income.  Accordingly, we sustain respondent’s determination on              
          this issue.                                                                 
          B.    Section 6662(a) Penalty                                               
                In the notice of deficiency, respondent determined that               
          petitioner is liable under section 6662(a) for an underpayment of           
          tax that is attributable to negligence and/or substantial                   
          understatement of income tax.                                               
                Section 6662(a) imposes a penalty equal to 20 percent of              
          any underpayment of tax that is attributable to either (1)                  
          negligence or disregard of rules or regulations or (2) a                    
          substantial understatement of income tax.  See sec. 6662(a) and             
          (b)(1) and (2).                                                             
                The term “negligence” includes any failure to make a                  
          reasonable attempt to comply with the provisions of the internal            
          revenue laws.  Sec. 6662(c); sec. 1.6662-3(b)(1), Income Tax                
          Regs.  The term “disregard” includes any careless, reckless, or             
          intentional disregard.  Sec. 6662(c); sec. 1.6662-3(b)(2), Income           
          Tax Regs.                                                                   



               11  Petitioner’s annuity policies were tax-deferred                    
          annuities, funded with pretax contributions.  Because the                   
          contributions to petitioner’s annuity policies were made with               
          pretax income, such contribution does not constitute an                     
          investment in the contract within the meaning of sec. 72(e)(6).             





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011