James E. Blasius and Mary Jo Blasius, et al. - Page 36

                                       - 36 -                                         
          that constitute “applicable published guidance” for purposes of             
          establishing a rebuttable presumption of “no justification” under           
          section 7430(c)(4)(B)(ii).  Proposed regulations are not included           
          in that list.  As an “advance notice of proposed rulemaking”,               
          both the ANPRM and Announcement 2002-9 are no more than “advance            
          notice” of a future issuance (proposed regulations) that, when              
          issued, will not constitute “applicable published guidance”.                
          Therefore, it is not clear that such pronouncements can, under              
          any circumstances, constitute “applicable published guidance”.              
          It is not necessary to resolve that issue in this case, however,            
          because the ANPRM and Announcement 2002-9 do not constitute                 
          “guidance” in any sense of that term.  They merely suggest                  
          principles of expense capitalization or deductibility that may be           
          adopted in the future.  They do not purport to change existing              
          administrative positions.  Therefore, they did not negate the               
          authorities under the then existing law (discussed supra) that              
          render respondent’s litigating position with respect to loan                
          origination/acquisition costs and professional fees substantially           
          justified.                                                                  
               Moreover, we find no inequity or impropriety in respondent’s           
          decision, reflected in the LMSB-SB/SE memorandum, to capitalize             
          selectively expenses that otherwise would be deductible under the           
          12-month rule, if and when adopted, in order to accomplish an               
          “efficient utilization of * * * resources”.  The IRS is not                 






Page:  Previous  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011