James E. Blasius and Mary Jo Blasius, et al. - Page 41

                                       - 41 -                                         
          (11th Cir. 1984) (Government’s conduct considered “reasonable”              
          and “substantially justified” where it took 11 months after the             
          taxpayer filed his complaint for Government counsel to obtain               
          from the IRS and review the relevant administrative files and,              
          after deciding to concede the Government’s case, an additional 40           
          days to obtain permission to concede from the IRS and the Review            
          Section of the Department of Justice); White v. United States,              
          740 F.2d 836, 842 (11th Cir. 1984) (Government’s concession of an           
          issue less than 3 months after taxpayer raised it in an amended             
          complaint considered “reasonable” behavior and, therefore,                  
          “substantially justified”); Shifman v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo.             
          1987-347 (Government’s concession within 2 months after the                 
          petition was filed considered “reasonable” thereby barring                  
          taxpayer’s recovery of litigating costs under section 7430).16              

               16  Harrison v. Commissioner, 854 F.2d 263 (7th Cir. 1998),            
          affg. T.C. Memo. 1987-52 and Shifman v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo.            
          1987-347, were decided under sec. 7430 before it was amended by             
          the Tax Reform Act of 1986, Pub. L. 99-514, sec. 1551(d)(1), 100            
          Stat. 2752, to substitute “was not substantially justified” for             
          “was unreasonable” in describing a Government position that could           
          give rise to an award of reasonable litigation costs under that             
          provision.  As we noted in Shifman v. Commissioner, supra at note           
          5: “this Court has previously held that the test of whether a               
          Government action is ‘substantially justified’ is essentially one           
          of reasonableness” (citing Baker v. Commissioner, 83 T.C. 822,              
          828 (1984)), vacated and remanded on another issue 787 F.2d 637             
          (D.C. Cir. 1986).  Ashburn v. United States, 740 F.2d 843 (11th             
          Cir. 1984), and White v. United States, 740 F.2d 836 (11th Cir.             
          1984), were decided under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA),           
          28 U.S.C. sec. 2412 (2000).  A principal reason for the enactment           
          of sec. 7430 was to extend the relief afforded by EAJA to                   
          proceedings in this Court so that “one set of rules * * * [would]           
                                                             (continued...)           





Page:  Previous  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011