Estate of Wayne C. Bongard, Deceased, James A. Bernards, Personal Representative - Page 68

                                       - 51 -                                         
          BFLP since that transfer was also a bona fide sale for adequate             
          and full consideration.  The estate contends that the creation of           
          BFLP was motivated by nontax reasons.  The BFLP agreement                   
          provides that BFLP was established to “acquire, own and sell from           
          time to time stocks (including closely held stocks), bonds,                 
          options, mutual funds and other securities.”  At trial, Mr.                 
          Fullmer testified that BFLP was established to provide another              
          layer of credit protection for decedent.  Additionally, the                 
          estate asserts that BFLP facilitated decedent’s and Cynthia                 
          Bongard’s postmarital agreement.  Messrs. Bernards and Fullmer              
          both also testified that BFLP was established, in part, to make             
          gifts.  On December 10, 1997, decedent made a gift of a 7.72-               
          percent ownership interest in BFLP to Cynthia Bongard.  This gift           
          was the sole transfer of a BFLP partnership interest by decedent            
          during his life.  BFLP also never diversified its assets during             
          decedent’s life, never had an investment plan, and never                    
          functioned as a business enterprise or otherwise engaged in any             
          meaningful economic activity.                                               
                    Bona Fide Sale Exception                                          
               In determining whether the bona fide sale exception in                 
          section 2036(a) applies to an intrafamily transaction, the                  
          substance of the transaction is subject to a higher level of                
          scrutiny.  See Estate of Thompson v. Commissioner, supra at 383.            







Page:  Previous  41  42  43  44  45  46  47  48  49  50  51  52  53  54  55  56  57  58  59  60  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011