Estate of Wayne C. Bongard, Deceased, James A. Bernards, Personal Representative - Page 104

                                        - 87 -                                        
          meaning of section 2512, because the transfers were for                     
          insufficient consideration, within the meaning of section                   
          25.2512-8, Gift Tax Regs.  I believe that a transfer to a family-           
          owned entity may constitute a taxable gift, even if the size of             
          the entity interest received by each transferor is deemed                   
          proportional to the value of the property contributed by that               
          transferor.8                                                                
               Consider the following hypothetical situation:9                        
                    Father, son, and daughter (F, S, and D) join in                   
               the formation of a family limited partnership (FLP),                   
               father making the bulk of the total contribution and                   
               receiving a limited partnership interest, S and D                      
               making smaller contributions and receiving general and                 


               8  Judge Ruwe suggests a gift-on-formation analysis in his             
          dissenting opinion in Estate of Strangi v. Commissioner, 115 T.C.           
          478, 496 (Ruwe, J., dissenting), affd. in part and revd. in part            
          293 F.3d 279 (5th Cir. 2002).  The Estate of Strangi majority               
          opinion, which I joined, rejects that possibility, at least on              
          the facts presented, on the grounds that Mr. Strangi (the                   
          decedent) did not give up control of the assets he contributed to           
          the family limited partnership (for a 99 percent limited                    
          partnership interest) and his contribution was allocated to his             
          capital account:  “Realistically, in this case, the disparity               
          between the value of the assets in the hands of decedent and the            
          alleged value of his partnership interest reflects on the                   
          credibility of the claimed discount applicable to the partnership           
          interest.  It does not reflect a taxable gift.”  Id. at 490.                
          Similarly, in Estate of Jones v. Commissioner, 116 T.C. 121, 128            
          (2001), we said:  “All of the contributions of property were                
          properly reflected in the capital accounts of decedent, and the             
          value of the other partners’ interests was not enhanced by the              
          contributions of decedent.  Therefore, the contributions do not             
          reflect taxable gifts.”                                                     
               9  The hypothetical and some of the following analysis are             
          suggested by Professor Leo L. Schmolka; Schmolka, “FLPs and                 
          GRATs:  What to do?”, 86 Tax Notes 1473 (Special Supplement, Mar.           
          13, 2000).                                                                  




Page:  Previous  77  78  79  80  81  82  83  84  85  86  87  88  89  90  91  92  93  94  95  96  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011