Charles E. and Noel K. Bradley - Page 10

                                       - 10 -                                         
          Virginia.15  In the complaint, as subsequently amended,                     
          petitioner alleged, inter alia, breach of contract with respect             
          to the alleged Boyle Agreement, intentional interference with               
          business relationship, fraud, negligent misrepresentation,                  
          promissory estoppel, legal malpractice, breach of fiduciary duty,           
          and conversion and corporate waste.  When the standstill and                
          right of first refusal issues were litigated by the parties, the            
          Chancery Court of New Castle, Delaware agreed with Mr. Boyle that           
          there was no enforceable Boyle Agreement.  See Oralco, Inc., et             
          al. v. Bradley, supra.                                                      
               B.   Bradley (individually and derivatively on behalf of               
          Oralco) v. Boyle, O’Sullivan, Graev & Karabell, and Oralco                  
               On April 21, 1994, petitioner filed a lawsuit in his                   
          individual capacity and on behalf of Oralco against Mr. Boyle,              
          OGK, and Oralco as a nominal defendant in the United States                 
          District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia.16  On            
          May 5, 1994, the District Court denied petitioner’s plea for a              
          temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction.  On                 
          February 27, 1995, the District Court, following a trial ruled              
          against petitioner and subsequently, on August 8, 1995, denied              
          petitioner’s motions to reconsider.                                         


               15 This is lawsuit number one of the Six Lawsuits.  See                
          supra note 3.                                                               
               16 This is lawsuit number two of the Six Lawsuits.  See                
          supra note 3.                                                               




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011