- 17 -
the Circuit Court’s order denying petitioner’s motion to
intervene in the Boyles’ divorce proceeding.21
E. Camilla Boyle v. Bradley (Litigation Regarding the
Stock Purchase Option)
During 1994 and 1995, while petitioner was attempting to
exercise his option to purchase Ms. Boyle’s stock in Oralco, Ms.
Boyle, through her attorney, Mr. McCamic, filed a lawsuit against
petitioner in the Circuit Court of Ohio County, West Virginia
alleging that the Option Agreement was induced by fraud.22 This
action was removed to the United States District Court for the
Northern District of West Virginia and assigned to Judge Stamp.
F. Bradley v. McCamic, Risdon, Bancboston (Third Party
Suit)
On May 24, 1994, petitioner, filed a third-party complaint
against Ms. Boyle’s attorney, Mr. McCamic, Bancboston employee,
Mr. Risdon, and Bancboston.23 On or about March 8, 1995, Ms.
Boyle responded to petitioner’s third-party complaint with an
affidavit stating that when she executed the Option Agreement,
she believed petitioner had the resources to pay for any shares
of Oralco she would receive in settlement of her marital claims.
21 This order also affirmed the order issued in lawsuit
number four. See also supra note 3.
22 This is lawsuit number five of the Six Lawsuits. See
supra note 3.
23 This is lawsuit number six of the Six Lawsuits. See
supra note 3.
Page: Previous 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 NextLast modified: May 25, 2011