Charles E. and Noel K. Bradley - Page 27

                                        - 27 -                                        
          Bachman, and Oralco refused to designate any portion of the $12             
          million settlement specifically for any unfiled alleged personal            
          injury claims of libel and slander.  Instead, even the                      
          Implementing Agreement designated the $12 million as payment for            
          all direct claims including any libel and slander.  This general            
          language does not allocate any amount to personal injury claims.            
               Pursuant to the settlement, payments were made on August 18,           
          1995, to Mr. Poole $13,229,808, Mr. Siebert $4,410,060, Mr. Hall            
          $1,200,072, and Precision $1,274,100 in exchange for their shares           
          of stock in Ormet.  Petitioner personally received $9,485,960               
          plus the $27 million paid to Signal and the $3,400,000 paid to              
          Costar for a grand total of $39,885,960 in exchange for his Ormet           
          shares plus $12 million for his direct claims.                              
               Petitioners also received $4 million as a reimbursement for            
          petitioner’s legal fees and expenses related to the Six Lawsuits.           
          Petitioners had deducted or would have deducted these reimbursed            
          legal fees and expenses as business expenses on their 1995                  
          Schedule C, Profit or Loss From Business.  The parties have                 
          stipulated that “None of the aforesaid legal fees or expenses               
          were allocated to any of petitioner’s claims against Oralco,                
          Ormet Corporation and/or Boyle for libel, slander and/or                    
          defamation.”  Nevertheless, petitioners excluded the $12 million            
          Ormet payment from their gross income on their 1995 return on the           
          basis of section 104(a)(2).                                                 






Page:  Previous  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011