- 27 - Bachman, and Oralco refused to designate any portion of the $12 million settlement specifically for any unfiled alleged personal injury claims of libel and slander. Instead, even the Implementing Agreement designated the $12 million as payment for all direct claims including any libel and slander. This general language does not allocate any amount to personal injury claims. Pursuant to the settlement, payments were made on August 18, 1995, to Mr. Poole $13,229,808, Mr. Siebert $4,410,060, Mr. Hall $1,200,072, and Precision $1,274,100 in exchange for their shares of stock in Ormet. Petitioner personally received $9,485,960 plus the $27 million paid to Signal and the $3,400,000 paid to Costar for a grand total of $39,885,960 in exchange for his Ormet shares plus $12 million for his direct claims. Petitioners also received $4 million as a reimbursement for petitioner’s legal fees and expenses related to the Six Lawsuits. Petitioners had deducted or would have deducted these reimbursed legal fees and expenses as business expenses on their 1995 Schedule C, Profit or Loss From Business. The parties have stipulated that “None of the aforesaid legal fees or expenses were allocated to any of petitioner’s claims against Oralco, Ormet Corporation and/or Boyle for libel, slander and/or defamation.” Nevertheless, petitioners excluded the $12 million Ormet payment from their gross income on their 1995 return on the basis of section 104(a)(2).Page: Previous 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011