- 29 -                                        
          from the dermatology practice was distributed to petitioner in              
          1996 in the form of a dividend.  Petitioner did not report, and             
          paid no tax on, this dividend in 1996.                                      
               This factor weighs against petitioner.                                 
               2.   Maintaining Inadequate Records                                    
               Lack of records is indicative of fraudulent intent.  Id.               
               Petitioner maintained inadequate records.  She kept few                
          personal records of the bankruptcy scheme or the transactions               
          surrounding the transfer of the $1,149,048 from the Sanwa account           
          to the personal Swiss bank account.                                         
               This factor weighs against petitioner.                                 
               3.   Failing To File Tax Return                                        
               Failing to file tax returns is indicative of fraudulent                
          intent.  Id.                                                                
               Although petitioner filed the 1996 return timely, that                 
          action is negated by the fact that she intentionally omitted from           
          that return her receipt of the $1,149,048 from BBL and attempted            
          to conceal her receipt of those funds by filing untimely,                   
          incorrect, and fraudulent tax returns for BBL for 1992, 1993,               
          1994, and 1995.                                                             
               This factor is neutral.                                                
               4.   Giving Implausible or Inconsistent Explanations of                
                    Behavior                                                          
               Giving implausible or inconsistent explanations of behavior            
          is indicative of fraud.  Id.                                                
Page:  Previous   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   NextLast modified: May 25, 2011