Letantia Bussell - Page 31

                                        - 31 -                                        
          altogether because, she stated, she “worked too damn hard for               
          this money to lose it to taxes”.  When her attorneys could not              
          find a legal way to accomplish her goal, she became angry and               
          instructed them to falsify BBL’s returns so that she could                  
          underreport its income and hers.                                            
               Petitioner’s handling of the Sanwa account displays yet more           
          evidence of her fraudulent intent.  For the 3 years that the                
          account was in existence, petitioner made not one transfer,                 
          withdrawal, or other transaction that might have brought the                
          account to the attention of respondent.  She wrote only one check           
          on the account for the expense of printing checks for the                   
          account.  When the account had served its fraudulent purpose, it            
          was closed with one large transfer of funds to an offshore                  
          account.  These transactions, taken together, constitute a                  
          methodical and sophisticated attempt to conceal income and                  
          assets.                                                                     
               This factor weighs against petitioner.                                 
               6.  Failing To Cooperate With Tax Authorities                          
               Failure to cooperate with tax authorities is indicative of             
          fraud.  Id.                                                                 
               Petitioner has been uncooperative with both respondent and             
          this Court as to the matter at hand.  She failed on numerous                
          occasions to respond timely to requests from respondent.  She               
          flouted Rule 91(f) and the Court’s order of November 18, 2003,              






Page:  Previous  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011