Geoffrey K. Calderone, Sr. - Page 4

                                        - 4 -                                         
          their MPG stock to an employee stock ownership plan (ESOP)4 which           
          he would form.  Petitioners accepted this advice and on January             
          5, 1993, sold their stock to the First Management Co., Inc.                 
          Employee Stock Ownership Plan and Trust (First Management), which           
          Jacob formed on December 28, 1992.                                          
                Jacob, Geoffrey, Peter, and two of MPG’s longtime                     
          employees, Michael Onorato (Onorato) and Wayne Morgan (Morgan),             
          participated in the ESOP.  Before forming the ESOP, Jacob sent a            
          letter to Geoffrey, Peter, Onorato, and Morgan advising them that           
          his role in the formation of First Management and its subsequent            
          purchase of stock created a likelihood of potential or perceived            
          conflicts of interest.  Jacob advised each of the four to seek              
          the advice of an independent attorney regarding the ESOP.  None             
          of them did so.                                                             
                As part of the consideration for petitioners’ sale of their           
          MPG stock to First Management, Jacob, as the trustee of First               
          Management, executed a secured promissory note dated January 5,             
          1993.  Under the note, First Management promised to pay to                  
          Geoffrey and Peter the principal sum of $13,955,543, plus                   
          interest, in 180 equal monthly installments.  Payments under the            
          note were made to Jacob, who accepted the payments as the                   
          representative of Geoffrey and Peter.  Petitioners gave Jacob               

               4 We call the underlying plan an “ESOP” for convenience, not           
          because it met the requirements of sec. 4975(e)(7).  The plan, in           
          fact, did not meet the requirements of sec. 4975(e)(7).                     





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011