Chickie's and Pete's, Inc. - Page 12

                                       - 12 -                                         
                  *       *       *       *       *       *       *                   
                    Finally, there is no evidence in the record to                    
               support petitioner’s contention that the disallowed                    
               portion of the royalty fee should be treated as deduct-                
               ible compensation for services rendered.  While I.R.C.                 
               � 162(a)(1) allows a taxpayer to deduct compensation                   
               paid, the taxpayer must establish that the parties                     
               intended the payment to be compensation for services                   
               rendered, and that the amount paid is reasonable. * * *                
               Here, since the payment was made pursuant to * * *                     
               [petitioner’s] license agreement, it is clear that it                  
               was not intended as compensation for the services Mr.                  
               Ciarrocchi rendered as petitioner’s officer/employee                   
               * * *.                                                                 
                    In any event, petitioner has provided no evidence                 
               to support the contention that it would be reasonable                  
               to allow additional compensation exceeding the $108,000                
               Mr. Ciarrocchi received as salary and management fees                  
               from petitioner for the services he performed as peti-                 
               tioner’s officer and employee.  If the balance [i.e.,                  
               $461,266] of the royalty fee exceeding the amount                      
               conceded by respondent is allowed as compensation, then                
               Mr. Ciarrocchi’s compensation for the taxable year                     
               ended June 30, 2000 would be $569,266. * * * the record                
               contains no frame of reference from which to even begin                
               the analysis the courts engage in when determining                     
               whether compensation is reasonable and, thus, deduct-                  
               ible under � 162(a)(1).  [Fn. ref. omitted.]                           
               It is petitioner’s position that it is entitled to deduct              
          the entire $902,476 payment under petitioner’s license agreement,           
          and not just the $441,210 that respondent concedes.  In support             
          of that position, petitioner asserts:                                       
               taxpayer [petitioner] is providing royalties to the person             
               [Mr. Ciarrocchi] who provided Italian recipes, and tradi-              
               tional family information, along with trade secrets and                
               methods in operating this type of restaurant.  The amount              
               paid to Mr. Ciarrocchi by the taxpayer was and is reason-              
               able.                                                                  
                    It is well established that for a payment to be                   
               deductible, the payer must have intended the payment to                





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011