Myrtle Jean Clark - Page 3

                                        - 2 -                                         
          6330(d) of respondent’s decision to proceed with collection of              
          petitioner’s Federal income tax liabilities for the 1991, 1992,             
          and 1993 tax years.                                                         
               Some of the facts were stipulated.  Those facts, with the              
          annexed exhibits, are so found and are made a part hereof.                  
          Petitioner’s legal residence at the time the petition was filed             
          was Bakersfield, California.                                                
               Petitioner was married to Zack Clark (Mr. Clark).  Mr. Clark           
          died on October 25, 2001.2  During the years in issue, petitioner           
          was a housewife.  Mr. Clark was self-employed as a mechanic in              
          1991 and operated a personnel and property management business              
          during 1991, 1992, and 1993.                                                
               Petitioner and Mr. Clark filed a joint Federal income tax              
          return for 1991 on July 3, 1996.  The return showed a tax of                
          $2,938.  This amount was not paid at the time of filing.                    
          Petitioner and Mr. Clark filed a joint Federal income tax return            
          for 1992 on April 15, 1996.  That return showed a tax of $9,141,            
          which was also not paid at the time of filing.  Petitioner and              
          Mr. Clark filed a joint Federal income tax return for 1993 on               
          April 16, 1996.  That return showed a tax of $6,798, which also             
          was not paid at the time of filing.                                         


               2Petitioner and Mr. Clark were divorced in 1984 but                    
          remarried about 1 year later.  For purposes of this proceeding,             
          however, petitioner was married to Mr. Clark during the years in            
          issue.  Therefore, the divorce is not a factor to be considered             
          in deciding this case.                                                      




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011