Claymont Investments, Inc., As Successor in Interest to New CCI, Inc. and Subsidiaries - Page 10

                                       - 10 -                                         
          deduction attributable to the alleged termination of the MCEG               
          relationship and a $2,698,000 loss deduction attributable to the            
          alleged termination of the MGM/UA relationship.7                            
          II. Loan Assumption and Foreign Exchange Gain Deferral                      
               On October 7, 1988, Holdings and CIC entered into a note               
          purchase agreement (Holdings/CIC transaction).  The agreement               
          provided that Holdings would lend CIC �29,498,525 (i.e., the                
          equivalent of $50 million) in exchange for a promissory note                
          (note).  The note had a 10-year term and required interest                  
          payments calculated at an 11.5-percent rate, compounded semi-               
          annually and payable annually.  All principal and accrued and               
          unpaid interest were due on October 7, 1998, but the principal              
          could be repaid at any time without penalty.                                
               In 1996, Carlton’s board of directors decided to acquire RSA           
          Advertising, Ltd. (RSA), and Cinema Media, Ltd., a subsidiary of            
          RSA.  A portion of this acquisition would be funded with funds              
          from CIHI.  On June 28, 1996, CIC and CIHI entered into a note              
          assumption agreement (CIC/CIHI transaction).  This agreement                
          provided that CIC would pay CIHI $49,784,881 in exchange for                
          CIHI’s assumption of CIC’s obligations to Holdings.  The                    
          $49,784,881 was the amount necessary to pay off the outstanding             


               7  In a third amendment to petition, petitioner, in the                
          alternative, contends that the loss relating to MCEG is properly            
          deductible for the year ending Sept. 30, 1992, 1993, or 1995.               
          With respect to MGM/UA, petitioner contends that the loss is                
          properly deductible for the year ending Sept. 30, 1992.                     




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011