- 18 - $2,307,500 ERA note and ERA’s lien under the $15.05 million CFP note, and that $2,782,700 was the remaining balance owed on the $15.05 million CFP note as of January 4, 1995.)6 After the January 3, 1995, transaction, CFX Financial made master lease rental payments to EQ in amounts equal to EQ’s installment payments to CFX Financial under the $14.125 million EQ installment note. Pursuant to the January 3, 1995, transaction, CFX claimed substantial tax benefits far greater than its economic investment in the first lease strip deal. Specifically, CFX Financial (which joined in consolidated income tax returns filed by CFX and its other affiliates, including CFX Bank) was in a position over the life of the master lease to (1) receive fully offsetting payments under the EQ installment note equal to CFX Financial’s master lease rental payments and only recognizing for tax purposes the relatively smaller installment note interest income, but (2) claiming substantially larger deductions for all its master lease rental payments. All of the transactions described in steps 1 through 8 above were structured and undertaken to benefit CFX as the first lease strip deal’s ultimate customer. CMACM received a $611,665 fee for providing advice relating to the above-described 6As noted above in steps 1 and 2, both the $2,307,500 Equity Resource Acquisition II (ERA) note to Computer Leasing, Inc. (CLI), and the $15.05 million Capital Finance Partners (CFP) note to ERA were payable within 60 days of Nov. 1, 1994.Page: Previous 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011