CMA Consolidated, Inc. & Subsidiaries, Inc. - Page 60

                                       - 26 -                                         
          equipment purchase note.  On that same date, CMA contributed                
          $68,000 to CMACM in exchange for 68,000 shares of CMACM common              
          stock.                                                                      
               For tax purposes, CMACM claimed a $4,081,319 carryover basis           
          in the Jenrich note, consisting of the note’s $4,056,220 face               
          value and accrued interest of $25,099.  By means of a March 25,             
          1996, letter agreement, CMACM and Jenrich agreed to offset                  
          CMACM’s over lease rental payment liability and Jenrich’s                   
          installment note liability against one another so that no cash              
          payments would have to be made by CMACM or Jenrich.                         
               6.  On November 27, 1995, CMACM transferred all of its                 
          interests and obligations under various agreements relating to              
          the K-Mart end-user lease equipment to Okoma Enterprises, LP                
          (Okoma), a Delaware limited partnership.  Among other things,               
          CMACM transferred the following to Okoma:  (1) CMACM’s over lease           
          rights in the K-Mart equipment, and (2) a portion of the Jenrich            
          note in the amount of $1,982,185.  In exchange, Okoma assumed               
          CMACM’s over lease obligations concerning the K-Mart end-user               
          lease equipment and also CMACM’s obligations on the CAP note in             
          the amount of $235,000.  Okoma’s 99-percent limited partner was             
          the Iowa Tribe and Okoma’s 1-percent managing general partner was           
          MBP Administration, Inc., a Nevada corporation.  On its 1995                
          Federal return, petitioner characterized CMACM’s partial                    
          disposition of the Jenrich note as a “rental expense” of                    






Page:  Previous  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011