CMA Consolidated, Inc. & Subsidiaries, Inc. - Page 97

                                       - 63 -                                         
               On its 1997 tax return, petitioner reported that CMACM had a           
          $1,179,013 cost basis for the remaining portion of the $4,056,220           
          Jenrich note that CMACM transferred to Lexington for Lexington’s            
          $1,000 unsecured promissory note.  On the basis of that,                    
          petitioner claimed a $1,178,013 loss on the partial disposition             
          of the Jenrich note to Lexington.  Petitioner also claimed                  
          $237,853 of rental expenses on its 1997 tax return attributable             
          to CMACM’s purported over lease rental payments during 1997.  The           
          rental expenses claimed by CMACM equaled, and were completely               
          offset by, the amounts due to CMACM under Jenrich’s equipment               
          purchase installment note.                                                  
               Finally, on its 1998 tax return, petitioner claimed                    
          deductions for the worthlessness of Lexington’s $10,000 and                 
          $1,000 unsecured promissory notes.                                          
               In sum, on the basis of its $10 investment in stock and                
          assumption of a purported $215,000 obligation owed by CAP to EQ,            
          petitioner claimed over $4.2 million in deductions from the                 
          second lease strip deal transactions.  ($1,982,825 + $459,221 +             
          $414,041 + $1,178,013 + $237,853 + $10,000 + $1,000 =                       














Page:  Previous  53  54  55  56  57  58  59  60  61  62  63  64  65  66  67  68  69  70  71  72  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011