- 55 - U.S. 451, 456 (1950). Whether a taxpayer’s characterization of a transaction should be respected depends upon whether there is a bona fide transaction with economic substance, compelled or encouraged by business or regulatory realties, imbued with tax- independent considerations, and not shaped primarily by tax avoidance features that have meaningless labels attached. See ACM Pship. v. Commissioner, supra; Casebeer v. Commissioner, 909 F.2d 1360 (9th Cir. 1990), affg. Sturm v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1987-625; Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc. v. Commissioner, 113 T.C. 254 (1999), affd. 254 F.3d 1313 (11th Cir. 2001). In deciding whether a transaction or series of transactions lacks economic substance, courts have used a two-pronged inquiry: (1) A subjective inquiry as to whether the transaction(s) was carried out for a valid business purpose; and (2) an objective inquiry concerning the economic effect of the transaction(s). ACM Pship. v. Commissioner, supra at 247-248; Casebeer v. Commissioner, supra at 1363; Kirchman v. Commissioner, 862 F.2d 1486, 1490-1491 (11th Cir. 1989), affg. Glass v. Commissioner, 87 T.C. 1087 (1986); Nicole Rose Corp. v. Commissioner, supra. We note that the two tests have much in common and are not necessarily discrete prongs of a “rigid two-step analysis”. Casebeer v. Commissioner, supra at 1363.Page: Previous 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011