CMA Consolidated, Inc. & Subsidiaries, Inc. - Page 84

                                       - 50 -                                         
               On its return for the tax year ended November 30, 1997,                
          petitioner reported only $500,000 of the $2.5 million NSI fee               
          received on January 30, 1997.  Petitioner did not report the $2             
          million portion of the NSI fee as income.                                   
               On the CKH and CKH’s affiliates consolidated income tax                
          return filed for the short tax year October 22, 1996, through               
          March 31, 1997, CKH reported the $2 million portion of the NSI              
          fee transferred by petitioner.  The $2 million of income was                
          offset by CKS’s $2,079,706 reported loss for that year and a                
          $1,739,488 NOL carryover from prior years.                                  
               In the notice of deficiency for the taxable year ended                 
          November 30, 1997, respondent determined that the $2 million                
          portion of the NSI consulting fee was includable in petitioner’s            
          income.  Petitioner alternatively alleged in the petition that,             
          in the event this $2 million portion of the NSI fee was held to             
          be taxable to petitioner, petitioner should be entitled to deduct           
          the $2 million payment to CKH as a business expense.                        
          2.  Petitioner’s Advances to Koehler                                        
               On August 31, 1994, Koehler executed a demand promissory               
          note to petitioner for $31,705 for advances that petitioner had             
          made to Koehler over a period extending back to the 1980s.                  


               16(...continued)                                                       
          to be retained by CKS.  The parties, however, stipulated that               
          $134,000 was the amount that CKS actually retained.  The record             
          does not disclose the reason for this $2,000 discrepancy.                   





Page:  Previous  40  41  42  43  44  45  46  47  48  49  50  51  52  53  54  55  56  57  58  59  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011